<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I&#8217;m standing for the RSA Fellowship Council</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sociability.org.uk/2009/05/22/rsa-fellowship-council/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sociability.org.uk/2009/05/22/rsa-fellowship-council/</link>
	<description>Social media. Social enterprise. Social impact.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Wilcox</title>
		<link>http://sociability.org.uk/2009/05/22/rsa-fellowship-council/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 12:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sociability.org.uk/?p=246#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy - I&#039;m entirely with you on the approach you propose, and really delighted that someone with your experience and commitment is standing for Council. I&#039;ve been doubtful about what an essentially advisory body can do in an old organisation like RSA, that inevitably has layers of governance and management, and a deeply embedded culture. I&#039;m impressed with what Matthew Taylor is trying to do to achieve change, and with you and other energetic Fellows standing it looks possible if ...
... if Council members become more than traditional representatives, and use online and other methods to engage with Fellows. That way they can both represent with more assurance, and help facilitate a more participative relationship between RSA trustees, staff and Fellows. 
Here&#039;s a practical thought: David Jennings has started a brainstorming place for RSA innovation ideas over here http://openrsa.uservoice.com/pages/13078-general
On a different scale, the White House is asking for ideas on how to be transparent, participatory, collaborative http://socialreporter.com/?p=606
Might council members try something similar ... ideally starting before the election?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy &#8211; I&#8217;m entirely with you on the approach you propose, and really delighted that someone with your experience and commitment is standing for Council. I&#8217;ve been doubtful about what an essentially advisory body can do in an old organisation like RSA, that inevitably has layers of governance and management, and a deeply embedded culture. I&#8217;m impressed with what Matthew Taylor is trying to do to achieve change, and with you and other energetic Fellows standing it looks possible if &#8230;<br />
&#8230; if Council members become more than traditional representatives, and use online and other methods to engage with Fellows. That way they can both represent with more assurance, and help facilitate a more participative relationship between RSA trustees, staff and Fellows.<br />
Here&#8217;s a practical thought: David Jennings has started a brainstorming place for RSA innovation ideas over here <a href="http://openrsa.uservoice.com/pages/13078-general" rel="nofollow">http://openrsa.uservoice.com/pages/13078-general</a><br />
On a different scale, the White House is asking for ideas on how to be transparent, participatory, collaborative <a href="http://socialreporter.com/?p=606" rel="nofollow">http://socialreporter.com/?p=606</a><br />
Might council members try something similar &#8230; ideally starting before the election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

